Red Dead Redemption Moving its Timeframe Would Have One Big impact

If Red Dead Redemption dramatically moves its timeline for the next game, it could have a massive impact on one important aspect. The Red Dead Redemption games have a definitive niche among Rockstar’s titles, as well as a reputation for high quality. Any significant change to the formula could potentially raise eyebrows among fans. Even so, with so little confirmed about Red Dead Redemption 3, there is a world of potential changes that it could bring, one of which is a timeline shift. However, the developers will need to keep one thing in mind regarding Red Dead Redemption‘s timeline.

There are western games other than Red Dead Redemption, but it set the bar for quality in the genre. This is especially true for Red Dead Redemption 2, which is arguably Rockstar’s best game to date. The games successfully recreated a lot of common tropes of cowboy life, such as shooting, hunting, and riding horses. The excellent story and characters on top of that only sweeten the overall product. While Rockstar has already achieved great things with the series, the bar is sky high for the next installment. That will make every decision involved in Red Dead Redemption 3‘s development crucial for its legacy.

Related

One Character is All But Confirmed for a Red Dead Redemption 3

The Red Dead Redemption series features a mysterious figure whose enduring presence could play another role in its future installments.

Red Dead Redemption 3’s Place in the Timeline Could Completely Overhaul the Series’ Weapon Selection

Red Dead Redemption 3’s Place in the Timeline is Unclear

Among the details players don’t know about Red Dead Redemption 3‘s story is its place in the timeline. The first game took place between 1911 and 1914, and the second took place between 1899 and 1907. Unless the next game is an interquel, or is completely unrelated to the story of the first two, it’s going to have to move up or down the timeline. Naturally, this would result in significant changes, as the cast would be different ages, and certain events would still need to happen. However, one unexpected consequence of moving the timeline could be the weapons that would appear.

The Setting of RDR3 Could Dictate What Weapons Will Be Available

One thing that would be changed with a major timeline shift is Red Dead Redemption‘s guns and other weapons. If the timeline goes too far back, then iconic weapons for the series like revolvers and shotguns won’t be available. Conversely, if the timeline goes too far forward, then more modern weapons like rifles and tommy guns could enter the picture. Since so much of the games’ combat is based around its selection of weapons, removing or replacing them would send shockwaves through the game. At the very least, the end result may not feel completely like a Red Dead Redemption title.

A New Time Period Could Affect RDR3’s Combat Balancing

Of course, a dramatic shift like that wouldn’t automatically ruin the game. After all, a new dynamic in Red Dead Redemption 3 could bring about some exciting new elements. At the very least, players would likely see a change to the way that Red Dead Redemption 2 handled the player’s weapon loadout, especially if some weapons don’t fall into those same categories. A game with enemies that have more advanced guns could even up the tension of the next Red Dead Redemption. Even in that case, the developers would have to be careful to ensure that the game balance remains as healthy as usual.

The timeline for Red Dead Redemption 3, like most details of the game, is up in the air. There are ways for Red Dead Redemption 3 to break tradition, and one of them is a shift in the timeline radical enough to shake up the weapon selection. However, there is the chance that too drastic of a change could make the next Red Dead Redemption feel unlike its predecessors in the long run. Regardless, it’s likely that Red Dead Redemption 3‘s place in the timeline could end up affecting how its combat will flow.