Alan Wake 2, BG3, Tears of the Kingdom, Elden Ring, GoW Ragnarok, Hades, Returnal, Fallout 4, Dishonored, It Takes Two, Untitled Goose Game, Breath of the Wild, both of The Last of Us, Ghost of Tsushima, Sekiro, Psychonauts 2, Control, Celeste, Super Mario Odyssey, Bloodborne, The Outer Wilds, The Witcher 3, Dragon Age: Inquisition, Cocoon, The Dredge, and more and more and more.
Up against Overwatch and Destiny as far as critical acclaim and recognition as ‘better’ for players.
And, let me be honest, even ‘for developers’ is a lie. Want to know why? Because it’s only good for people who can pump out graphics constantly and not overall quest designers, coders, engine devs, etc.
What this guy means is “we can give a lot of cosmetic content to players, who we think players like more because people spend money on it, and it’s best for us because we don’t have to pay for a full team to create a new game and just the people to pump out new graphics from one season to another.” In no way is his comment a true reflection of what is ‘better for players’ let alone ‘better for the industry stability over longer periods of time.’
This is more investor mindset focusing on maximizing profits by getting consumers to buy less for more while they spend less making it. That’s it.
You know what’s best for players? Newer, better, and more content that is good and not just cosmetic. Live service isn’t that unless you pay $60 a year to them to add more for it (like Destiny and CoD do). Then you might get some improvements and new content. Even then? Not usually.
Leave a Reply