Marvel Rivals’ Surrender Controversy Explained

Posted by By our-little-miss-is-home December 24, 2024 8 Views 8 Min Read
Marvel Rivals' Surrender Controversy Explained



Marvel Rivals, NetEase’s response to the likes of Overwatch, has been picking up steam since it launched earlier this month. A bevy of unique and iconic characters to play as, satisfying combat fundamentals, and dazzling, if not exactly original, arenas combine to form the backbone of Marvel Rivals, while special features like team-ups and the lack of a role queue help set it apart from its contemporaries.

The gulf between Marvel Rivals and other hero/team shooters has recently widened thanks to the new surrender feature. At any point during a match, a team can vote to surrender, and if a majority votes in favor, then the obvious happens. Crucially, surrendered games don’t incur a disconnect penalty, making the option a solid choice for those who see the writing on the wall and wish to get out early. Proponents of this feature have cited this penalty, alongside more significant issues like an unbalanced meta, as justifications for its inclusion, but not everyone is over the moon about it.

a (3)-2

Related


Marvel Rivals’ Star-Lord Doesn’t Need It, But Could Flourish with a Neat Team-Up Ability

Marvel Rivals’ Star-Lord is already a fairly strong character, and yet, like others, he’s arguably underutilized when it comes to Team-Ups.

Potential Issues Posed by the Marvel Rivals Surrender Feature

Gaming audiences tend to generate a diverse range of opinions whenever a live-service title institutes a major change, but in the case of the Marvel Rivals surrender feature, detractors may have some particularly good points. Yes, adding the option to vote in favor of a surrender could arguably make for a smoother overall experience, as players can regain a sense of control rather than just awaiting domination in a bleak situation, but it could also encourage hopelessness.

Consider, for instance, a group of new players seeking unranked matches in Marvel Rivals. They are inexperienced with the hero shooter genre, and still learning the basics. In a game like Overwatch, losses force new players to learn the intricacies of each character and the game as a whole, prompting continued growth. But if there is an option to simply surrender whenever one feels that things are headed south, then new players may not actively push themselves to master the gameplay, resulting in a dynamic where players only stick around in games where they are leading by a mile. The fostering of this defeatist mentality is what critics of Marvel Rivals‘ surrender feature have railed against.

It’s worth noting how this feature could impact inter-team dynamics as well; it can be frustrating for an individual who wants to push ahead and turn the tide of battle to be matched with a group who wants to cut their losses and surrender.

Marvel Rivals’ Team Surrender Is Likely Here to Stay

Like so many things in gaming, as in life, it’s impossible to classify the new surrender feature as objectively good or bad for Marvel Rivals. The aforementioned concerns of toxic negativity and poor team dynamics are certainly valid, but they can be easily countered by arguments based on connectivity issues and poor in-game balancing—and indeed, they have. In other words, there are positives to the feature, as it’s essentially just a way to duck out of a game without incurring a disconnect penalty. If a player really wanted to quit, and they didn’t have the option to vote on a surrender, they could do so at a relatively minor cost.

What will be more interesting to see is how the Marvel Rivals community reacts to this feature in the long term. It’s still a fairly fresh addition, so there’s no telling how it will shape the dynamic of the game in the coming weeks and months. NetEase could even alter the surrender system over time, perhaps adding penalties for failed votes or restricting voting to certain circumstances.

Source link