As CD Projekt Red’s most recent release, Cyberpunk 2077 brings a thought-provoking and dystopian sci-fi RPG into the spotlight. However, before Cyberpunk 2077 took the world by storm, through both controversy and redemption, The Witcher 3 was the developer’s most beloved title. Now that Cyberpunk 2077‘s sequel, codenamed Project Orion, is in the works, many questions have arisen about what the next chapter will entail.
Approaching a sequel to Cyberpunk 2077 is a tricky situation, as there are a variety of possible endings for players to fall into. While some are more positive than others, the prospect of CD Projekt Red picking a canon ending is a risky decision. Despite this issue, there could be a solid way to connect both Cyberpunk 2077 and Project Orion that is satisfying. The Witcher 3 may not share much in common with its fellow CD Projekt Red kin, but the general synopsis of Geralt’s journey could serve as the perfect blueprint for Project Orion to follow.
Related
Fortnite’s Rumored Cyberpunk 2077 Collab Would Be Shooting Itself in the Foot Without One Type of Content
The rumored Cyberpunk 2077 collaboration is a long time coming, but Fortnite shouldn’t just take the obvious route when it comes to cosmetics.
Geralt’s Main Goal in The Witcher 3 Could Be Solid Inspiration For Project Orion
Geralt’s Hunt For Ciri Can Be Revisited With V
In The Witcher 3, the main story follows Geralt searching for his adoptive daughter and former apprentice Ciri, as she is being pursued by the Wild Hunt. When it comes to Cyberpunk 2077, V’s fate is left open-ended, but each ending makes it fairly difficult to revisit the character fully. While Project Orion can go in a lot of different directions, a brand-new protagonist seems to be one of the strongest choices CD Projekt Red can make. However, this doesn’t mean that V has to be gone for good.
Like with The Witcher 3, Project Orion may want to look into a story that puts a fresh protagonist in the driver’s seat who could potentially be on the hunt for V. After the events of Cyberpunk 2077, V has gained quite a reputation in Night City, and it definitely wouldn’t be outside the realm of possibility for him to on many wanted lists. The infamy V builds for themselves in Night City can’t just be brushed over in Project Orion, so a protagonist who is searching for them, like everyone else, could be a fascinating way to connect the two stories.
After the
Phantom Liberty
DLC, there are seven total endings for
Cyberpunk 2077
.
Flipping Cyberpunk 2077 On Its Head
Cyberpunk 2077 focused on the street-based grind for greatness in Night City, but if Project Orion takes a Witcher 3-inspired approach, then a sequel could go down a very different road. Instead of a character struggling on the streets of Night City, possibly showing the perspective of an NCPD officer may be a fascinating contrast that also keeps the narrative fresh. Over time, a cop character could potentially become more corrupt or sympathetic to the plight of Night City as players are presented with specific choices on a theoretical hunt for V. The unpredictability of Cyberpunk 2077 is one of its strongest points, and a story-shift into an NCPD officer searching for V would definitely be bold, but there are plenty of other character types who could be searching for them as well.
Project Orion Keeping Ties With V Has Pros and Cons
There’s no telling what the story of Project Orion has in store, but if CD Projekt Red insists on staying connected to V, it may be best to do so loosely. Approaching Project Orion with a clean slate and avoiding getting too muddled in the events of its predecessor could sidestep possible continuity issues.
Project Orion
rumors suggest it could take place on the moon.
However, the desire for more V, even if through loose connections, is understandable. Night City is a fascinating world, and V is a major part of that. Until CD Projekt Red confirms more about Project Orion, there is only speculation, but the best way to tie Cyberpunk 2077 to its sequel may be found in CD Projekt Red’s previous work.
Leave a Reply